Benchmark module · Use case
Report AI visibility to executives
Your board asks how the company is showing up in AI, and the honest answer today is a handful of screenshots. A single GVI™ score with four component signals, competitor benchmarks, and a trend line — exportable as a PDF that needs no explanation.
Last updated
How do you report AI visibility to executives?
A single GVI™ score with four component signals, competitor benchmarks, and a trend line — exportable as a PDF that needs no explanation. The work runs in four steps: set a baseline gvi™ across all six engines; agree the competitor set the board recognises; review movement on a monthly cadence; export the report and attach it to the board pack. Screenshots replaced by a metric with history, competitive context, and a clear owner.
Key facts
- Job to be done
- Report AI visibility to executives
- Platform module
- Benchmark
- Typical owner
- CMOs and heads of marketing
- Available from
- Growth — $119 / month
- Engines covered
- ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot, Grok
- Outcome
- Screenshots replaced by a metric with history, competitive context, and a clear owner.
The problem
Your board asks how the company is showing up in AI, and the honest answer today is a handful of screenshots.
This is not a reporting inconvenience — it is a measurement gap. AI answers are generated fresh each time and vary between sessions, so anecdotal checks cannot establish a trend and cannot prove whether anything you changed made a difference.
How Geosystems AI handles it
A single GVI™ score with four component signals, competitor benchmarks, and a trend line — exportable as a PDF that needs no explanation.
- Set a baseline GVI™ across all six engines.
- Agree the competitor set the board recognises.
- Review movement on a monthly cadence.
- Export the report and attach it to the board pack.
What you get
Everything below lands in your private workspace and is exportable as PDF or CSV, so the evidence travels with the decision.
| Output | What it contains |
|---|---|
| GVI™ score | One headline number with four component signals |
| Trend history | Six to twelve months of movement depending on plan |
| Competitive context | Recommendation Share™ against named rivals |
| PDF export | Board-ready output generated from live data |
What good looks like
Screenshots replaced by a metric with history, competitive context, and a clear owner.
The measurement backbone is the same across every use case: GVI™ scores each answer on Presence, Prominence, Attribution, and Accuracy, while Recommendation Share™ places that score against the competitors you name. Both are re-run on a schedule so movement is a trend, not a screenshot.
Report AI visibility to executives
Start with a free AI Visibility Scan and get the baseline this use case builds on — a GVI™ score across all six AI engines, plus every inaccuracy currently in circulation.
Frequently asked questions
Who typically owns this inside a company?
CMOs and heads of marketing. In smaller teams it usually sits with whoever owns demand generation, because the impact lands on pipeline first.
Which plan do I need?
Growth — $119 / month. Starter is $59 per month, Growth is $119 per month, and Scale is $199 per month. Annual billing is discounted.
Does this cover every AI engine?
Yes — ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot, and Grok are all tracked on the same prompt set, so results are directly comparable between engines.
How do I try it before subscribing?
Run the free AI Visibility Scan at /free-ai-visibility-check. It returns a GVI™ baseline across all six engines with no account required.